Quickly exit this site by pressing the Escape key Leave this site
We use some essential cookies to make our website work. We’d like to set additional cookies so we can remember your preferences and understand how you use our site.
You can manage your preferences and cookie settings at any time by clicking on “Customise Cookies” below. For more information on how we use cookies, please see our Cookies notice.
Your cookie preferences have been saved. You can update your cookie settings at any time on the cookies page.
Your cookie preferences have been saved. You can update your cookie settings at any time on the cookies page.
Sorry, there was a technical problem. Please try again.
This site is a beta, which means it's a work in progress and we'll be adding more to it over the next few weeks. Your feedback helps us make things better, so please let us know what you think.
1.1 This Standard Operating Procedure has been reviewed in February 2023 – amendments made to factor in the launch of Axon Evidence.com (DAMS)
2.1 This SOP provides direction to operational staff as to the use and management of third-party CCTV in an investigation and its provision to the CPS for Court presentation. It also covers the process to be followed in terms of suspect recognition from CCTV footage or stills.
Compliance with this procedure/SOP and any governing policy is mandatory.
3.1. CCTV – Legal Responsibilities
3.1.1. Currently, there is no primary legislation specifically controlling the use and publication of CCTV images. To use CCTV effectively, investigators should have a clear understanding of the relevant legislation, together with force and national policy relating to its use.
3.1.2. The existing applicable legislation that encompasses the management of evidence, including CCTV, comprises the following:
3.4. CCTV – Key Evidence
3.4.1. If CCTV is key evidence in a case, every effort must be made to utilise DAMS to play it to the suspect in interview and their response / reaction recorded on the ‘Defendant Interview’ section of the MG5.
3.4.2. If a suspect is charged or summonsed for an offence a copy of the evidential CCTV must be provided to CPS, using DAMS (Please refer to DAMS SOP W 6003 Procedure/SOP – Sharing of DAMS Digital Assets), unless the CCTV - Guilty plea criteria is met (see 3.6).
3.5. Transcoding CCTV
3.5.1. Transcoding means changing CCTV footage from its native format into another technical format. Transcoding is a digital process. Since the implementation of the DAMS (Digital Asset Management System) all media uploaded will go through an automated process of transcoding. The original remains intact but a viewable (transcoded) version is created. DAMS is not capable of transcoding or playing all file types of CCTV footage uploaded and in these instances a process has been put in place.
3.5.2. DAMS has a sharing facility and has superseded Egress as the means of evidence provision accepted by CPS and HMCTS.
3.5.3. Following the implementation of DAMS on the 21st September 2022 any CCTV ingested into DAMS will be converted into a playable format automatically by the DAMS. Digital Assets uploaded to DAMS must be checked to ensure it plays. For instances when an Asset does not play within DAMS Officers or staff must retain the transport media and seek assistance from the Digital Hubs. The Digital Hubs will attempt to assist in the review of the Asset. Further specialist assistance, if required can be sought from DFU CCTV. For such assistance, form 3330C must be fully completed. If the Asset is already uploaded to DAMS a link must be provided. However if the original CCTV was received via a disc instead of a DAMS link the disc must be labelled, exhibited and sealed before it is sent to the Digital Forensics CCTV Unit (DFU CCTV) by secure delivery until DFU have uploaded a playable format to DAMS which becomes the master. The Officer submitting must ensure that exhibits are with DFU with adequate time to complete the request.
3.5.4. Original exhibits will be retained with DFU for a limited period but will be categorised under MOPI guidelines. Once the minimum number of storage boxes is reached the boxes will be archived for long term storage. Storage of exhibits is categorised together in MOPI levels (i.e. all MOPI 1 together, all MOPI 3 together etc.)
3.5.5. The digital copy of the CCTV which has been transferred to the CPS via DAMS is retained on DAMS in accordance with the DAMS retention policy W 6004 Procedure/SOP – Review, Retention and Disposal of DAMS Digital Assets
3.5.6. Digital Forensics will prioritise CCTV according to due date set in Athena which are within cases required for a court hearing and those delivered in person from specialist departments for serious crime investigations (e.g. SCD and PPU).
3.6. CCTV – Guilty Plea
3.6.1. An agreement has been reached between Kent Police, CPS and HMCTS on the provision of CCTV for anticipated guilty plea cases. CCTV will no longer need to be provided for the first court hearing providing all of the following criteria are met:
3.6.2. In all other cases where CCTV constitutes key evidence, or the court adjourn the matter for the CCTV to be provided, Kent Police will provide it via DAMS.
3.7. CCTV – Identifications / Intelligence and PACE Code D
3.7.1. Recognition is the belief by a person that they know an individual captured on CCTV or a still image.
3.7.2. Staff must be clear about whether their recognition constitutes an Identification of a suspect or is for Intelligence purposes only.
3.7.3. Failure to make this distinction may result in cases being subsequently lost at court.
3.7.4. Identification evidence must be recorded in compliance with Para 3.36 of Code D, PACE Codes of Practice. The completion of a proforma statement is required and should the person be charged, the identification will constitute key evidence in the case.
3.7.5. Intelligence is not a Code D compliant identification and must be recorded as such and handled appropriately in the investigation. Should the suspect deny the offence, this information will be insufficient to prove identification.
3.7.6. ‘Caught on Camera’ now distinguishes between these two categories of recognition on inSite. Staff must ensure they select the correct category on the still and complete a proforma statement (IDENTIFICATION) or an e-mail (INTELLIGENCE) when they recognise a suspect.
4.0 Equality Impact Assessment
4.1 An Equality Impact Assessment has been carried out and shows the proposals in this procedure would have little or no potential or actual differential impact on grounds of race, ethnicity, nationality, gender, transgender, disability, age, religion or belief or sexual orientation.
5.0 Risk Assessment
5.1 This SOP has been assessed as low risk.
6.0 Consultation
6.1 The following were asked to consult on this document:
DFU Team Leader
DAMS Product Manager
7.0 Monitoring and Review
7.1 This procedure/SOP is scheduled for full review every two years and will be reviewed by the author and owner to ensure it still remains accurate and fit for purpose.
8.0 Security
8.1 Kent Police has measures in place to protect the security of your data in accordance with our Information Management Policy (Policy W1000 – Information Management).
9.0 Retention and Disposal of Records
9.1 Kent Police will hold data in accordance with our Records Review, Retention and Disposal Policy (Policy W1012 - Records Review, Retention and Disposal)
Policy reference: CCTV - use in an investigation procedure (S14004)
Contact point: DCS Head of Victim Justice
Date last reviewed: February 2023
If you require any further information or to request any documentation referenced within the policy please email [email protected]. For general enquiries, contact us.